|
TRADE MEASUREMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TRADE MEASUREMENT REVIEW
OF THE
UNIFORM TRADE MEASUREMENT LEGISLATION
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT
AND
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
AVERAGE QUANTITY SYSTEM
October 2000
Introduction
Under a formal agreement signed in 1990 between the Commonwealth,
the States and the Territories (except Western Australia), all jurisdictions,
with the exception of Western Australia, enacted model uniform trade
measurement legislation.
In 1995 a Trade Measurement Advisory Committee ("TMAC")
was formed by the Ministerial Council on Consumer Affairs ("MCCA")
and one of its functions was the ongoing review of trade measurement
legislation nationally.
TMAC has recommended that the trade measurement legislation be
amended to improve trade measurement administration and MCCA has
requested that Queensland proceed with drafting the recommended
amendments to the Queensland Trade Measurement Act 1990 ("the
Act"). In the interests of uniformity these amendments will
be used as the model by the other participating States and Territories
to amend their own legislation.
Note: The numbering of the Act and Regulations in this document
refers to the Queensland legislation. It may differ from that of
other States and Territories.
This paper addresses one of the proposed amendments and is forwarded
to your organisation for comment because of your involvement in
the relevant industry. Only those amendments that relate to the
operation of your organisation have been forwarded to you for comment.
This paper addresses the proposal to in relation to the Average
Quantity System:
"The Average Quantity System be introduced into legislation
and current shortweight provisions be repealed. This includes
repealing `mass when packed' and `mass at standard condition'
provision".
However, should you wish to comment on the other amendments to
the legislation, please contact this Office so that a copy of the
relevant consultation papers can be forwarded to you.
In relation to those traders who package goods by length or width,
area or count, further information in relation to the effect of
this amendment on their business activities can be obtained by contacting
the Manager of the Trade Measurement Section of the Office of Fair
Trading as detailed below.
Other Amendments
The other amendments for which Issues Papers have been prepared
are:
1. "Amendment to Section 28 of the Trade Measurement (Pre-packed
Articles) Regulation 1991" - Section 28 of the Trade
Measurement (Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991 should be
amended by repealing the Table and requiring the products listed
in sub-regulation (1) to be unit priced only when packed in random
mass packs.
2. "Amendment of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 - Firewood"
- The provisions of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 should
be amended to make it a requirement to "stack" firewood
for sales by volume. Definitions of "stacked" and "firewood"
are also seen as a requirement. (This does not preclude firewood
being sold by reference to mass or per load.)
3. A new section 15(1)(c) be added to the Act which states that
the administering authority `may provide for certification periods
to be set'.
Section 15(2) of the Act be re-written so that it relates to
the new section 15(1)(c) and states that the administering authority
`may provide for the certification of a measuring instrument
as often as is necessary or desirable in relation to specified
classes of instruments'
4. "Amendment of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 and
the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 - Certificates
of Suitability" - The Trade Measurement Act 1990 and
the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 should
be amended to remove the separate requirement for certificates of
suitability for public weighbridges and a requirement which incorporates
the certificate of suitability as part of the licence be made.
5. "Amendment of Section 23(1) of the Trade Measurement
(Weighbridges) Regulation 1991" - Section 23(1) of the
Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 should be
amended to make the provision of tare mass books optional.
6. "Amendment of Section 23(2), (3) and (4) of the Trade
Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991" - Section 23(2),
(3) and (4) of the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation
1991 should be amended to allow for the electronic printing
and storage of measurement tickets.
7. "Amendment of Section 19(b) of the Trade Measurement
(Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991" - Section 19(b)
of the Trade Measurement (Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991
be amended by deleting the existing words and replacing them with:
"(b) the total net mass of all the eggs in the package".
This would also require the deletion of the reference to eggs
in section 18(1)(a) of the Regulation.
8. "Amendment of Section 25 of the Trade Measurement Act
1990" - Section 25 of the Trade Measurement Act 1990
should be repealed to remove the "Special provisions for sale
of meat".
National Competition Policy
You are also asked to comment on the implications that the Average
Quantity System and the repeal of the current shortweight provisions
may have in terms of the National Competition Policy review of legislation.
Under the Competition Principles Agreement signed by the States,
Territories and the Commonwealth, it was agreed that existing legislation
and proposed legislation would be reviewed in terms of its impact
on competition in the relevant market. The Agreement provides that:
"The guiding principle is that legislation ... should not
restrict competition unless it can be demonstrated that:
(a) the benefits of the restriction to the community as a whole
outweigh the costs; and
(b) the objectives of the legislation can only be achieved by
restricting competition".
The review that is to be conducted should:
"(a) clarify the objectives of the legislation;
(b) identify the nature of the restriction on competition;
(c) analyse the likely effect of the restriction on competition
and on the economy generally;
(d) address and balance the costs and benefits of the restriction;
and
(e) consider alternative means for achieving the same result
including non-legislative approaches".
The specific issues that you are asked
to address are set out in the body of this Issues Paper.
|
HOW TO MAKE COMMENTS AND SUBMISSIONS
You are invited to make comments and submissions on the issues
raised in this Issues Paper.
You are also invited to contact the MCCA Secretariat to request
information on the other amendments proposed to be made to
the trade measurement legislation.
Written comments and submissions should be sent to:
Neil Power
Executive Officer
Ministerial Council on Consumer Affairs
Consumer Affairs Division
Department of the Treasury
Parkes Place
PARKES ACT 2600
Facsimile transmissions can be sent to (02) 6263 2960
Email responses can be sent to npower@treasury.gov.au
Oral submissions can be made by telephoning Malcolm Bartlett
on (07) 3836 0409
Closing date for submissions is 30 November 2000.
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
Unless there is an indication from you that you wish your submission
to remain confidential, your submission may be subject to release
under the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld).
Background
The Average Quantity System is a system for the determining the
measurement of packaged goods with constant nominal content. It
provides for the confirmation of goods sold by weight, measure or
number by utilising sampling standards based on those developed
by the International Organisation for Standardisation and others
such as the United States Military Specification.
Currently, the method of determining a deficiency in packaged goods
is administered by what is known as a minimum quantity system. This
means that a package marked with a statement of the quantity which
the package contains must contain at least that quantity. This applies
throughout the distribution system.
The current legislation allows deficiencies of no more than 5%
in any one package provided the contents of that package and eleven
other randomly selected packages of the same kind and stated quantity
show no aggregate deficiency.
A Discussion Paper was prepared and distributed in 1997. This appears
as Attachment A to this paper. The Discussion Paper contains further
information about the Average Quantity System and the possible benefits
involved in adopting the Average Quantity System.
Part V of the Trade Measurement (Pre-packed Articles) Regulation
1991 provides for:
· The extent of deficiency necessary to constitute short measure;
· Articles marked "mass when packed", etc;
· Articles marked "mass at standard condition";
· Other pre-packed articles;
· The method of determining average measurement for the purposes
of section 33 of the Trade Measurement Act 1990.
The provisions in Part V of the Regulation, sections 33-37, provide
that for most pre-packed articles a deficiency is allowed on any
individual pre-packed article of 5% and that the average deficiency
over a sample of 12 pre-packed articles is nil.
There are some specific provisions for a number of listed products
and they are permitted to have higher deficiencies and may have
average deficiencies over a sample of 12 pre-packed articles, when
measured the day after the article is packed. These particular provisions
apply only if the package is marked "mass when packed"
and the package is not hermetically sealed.
The tables listing the various products are:
Description of Article
|
Permissible Actual Deficiency - %
|
Permissible Average Deficiency - %
|
|
Bar soaps
|
21
|
16
|
|
Cotton wool
|
7
|
2
|
|
Flax
|
8
|
3
|
|
Glauber salts
|
7
|
2
|
|
Jute
|
9
|
4
|
|
Manila
|
8
|
3
|
|
Mushrooms (fresh)
|
18
|
13
|
|
Oven-baked animal biscuits
|
9
|
4
|
|
Personal deodorant tablets
|
12
|
7
|
|
Personal soap tablets (medicinal or toilet)
|
11
|
6
|
|
Sisal
|
8
|
3
|
|
Soap flakes
|
10
|
5
|
|
Soap power (excluding detergent powders)
|
15
|
10
|
|
Tobacco
|
10
|
5
|
|
Washing soda
|
7
|
2
|
|
Whole hams
|
7
|
2
|
Class of Article
|
Permissible Actual Deficiency - %
|
Permissible Actual Deficiency - %
|
|
Class A fibre (wool or other animal fibre, viscose or cuprammonium
rayon, or a mixture of any 2 or more of them)
|
11
|
6
|
|
Class B fibre (silk, cotton or cellulose acetate or a mixture
of any 2 or more of them)
|
7
|
2
|
|
Class C fibre (a fibre, or a mixture of fibres, that is not
a Class A or Class B fibre)
|
5
|
0
|
Proposal for Amendment
It is proposed that the Average Quantity System be introduced into
the legislation and that the current shortweight provisions be repealed.
This would include repealing "mass when packed" and "mass
at standard condition" provisions.
The method of determining what is a deficiency needs to be fair
to both consumers and packers and needs to ensure that the statement
of the quantity contained in packaged goods is meaningful to consumers
to allow them to make informed decisions when they select and purchase
goods.
A change to the Average Quantity System will align the requirements
for determining what constitutes a deficiency on pre-packed articles
in Australia (and New Zealand) with internationally accepted practice.
To apply the Average Quantity System correctly, there are three
rules:
Rule 1
The declared quantity on a package should accurately reflect the
quantity being supplied, so the average net contents of the packages
in a lot (production run) may not be less than the declared quantity.
Rule 2
No more than 2.5% of the packages in a lot (production run) may
have negative errors more than the prescribed tolerable negative
error.
Rule 3
No package shall have a negative error by more than twice the prescribed
tolerable negative error.
All of these rules must be applied together.
The method of determining a deficiency is provided by using a statistically
based sampling procedure. This will mean that any sample inspected
will be more representative of the production than the current selection
of 12 packages at random.
It is appropriate to ensure than on average packages contain the
declared quantity and the average requirement will provide protection
to consumers who purchase more than one package of a particular
product. Generally a deficient package will be averaged out by an
overfilled one.
Some manufacturers and packers have concerns in relation to articles
that loose weight due to dehydration. These articles are known as
desiccating goods.
Consumers also have equal concerns that provisions for "desiccating
goods" do not allow manufacturers and packers to provide short
quantity goods throughout poor or negligent packaging practice.
The proposal for amendment is that provisions used in the European
Union be incorporated into the changes. These would provide that
"desiccating goods" must comply with the provisions for
the Average Quantity System for a period of 7 days after the day
of manufacture or packing. After the 7 day period has elapsed, the
"desiccating goods" must measure within double the usual
tolerance allowed. This provision will give consumers greater assurance
than they currently have with "desiccating goods". ie.
those currently listed in the tables to sections 34 and 35 of the
Regulation. The provision will not impose adverse requirements on
manufacturers and packers, but will recognise that quantities of
some products are difficult to control.
It is further proposed that a provision to prevent any "desiccating
goods" being put onto the market in an excessively deficient
manner. That is, "desiccating goods" should never be deficient
by more than twice the tolerable negative error.
The Average Quantity System has been adopted in a number of countries
and international organisations. These countries are listed in the
Discussion Paper which appears as Attachment A to this paper.
The primary objective of trade measurement legislation is to promote
fair trading and accuracy in the relevant market places. Trade measurement
authorities are responsible for ensuring that traders and consumers
are confident that goods are bought and sold in a fair and equitable
manner.
National Competition Policy guidelines provide that the benefit
to the restriction to the community should outweigh the costs and
that the objectives of the legislation cannot be achieved by any
other means.
Both traders and consumers will benefit from this amendment and
the amendment should not result in any restriction on competition.
The rules on the standard of quantity statements will be clearer
for both packers and consumers. Packers can adopt the rules in their
quality management systems and they will be more confident that
their goods will comply with the legislation. Packers will also
not need to change equipment in order to comply with the Average
Quantity System. Consumers will know that they have a 97.5% chance
of receiving the stated quantity within the prescribed tolerance.
The Average Quantity System should also reduce technical barriers
to trade and provide an internationally accepted standard.
You are invited to comment on the amendment. In particular your
comments in relation to the following questions are welcomed:
1. Should the Average Quantity System be introduced and should
the current shortweight provisions be repealed as described? Why
do you think so? This includes repealing `mass when packed' and
`mass at standard condition' provisions.
2. Will the amendment as described have any impact on you whether
you are a trader or a consumer?
3. If it is considered that the amendment will impact on you, can
you describe the potential costs to you either as a trader or a
consumer?
4. Are there any potential restrictions involved in the proposed
amendment?
5. If there are considered to be any restrictions, will these restrictions
involve any cost or disadvantage to you either as a trader or consumer?
6. Will the proposed amendment have any impact on competition in
the market place in which you either trade or purchase goods? If
so, what impact will it have?
7. Are there any other issues that you consider relevant?
If you are interested in participating in follow up consultation
on these issues, please provide us with a telephone number where
you can be contacted during office hours.
|