|
|
TRADE MEASUREMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
TRADE MEASUREMENT REVIEW
OF THE
UNIFORM TRADE MEASUREMENT LEGISLATION
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT
AND
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 15
OF THE
TRADE MEASUREMENT ACT 1990
October 2000
|
TRADE MEASUREMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
REVIEW OF THE UNIFORM TRADE MEASUREMENT LEGISLATION
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 15 OF THE
TRADE MEASUREMENT ACT 1990
Introduction
Under a formal agreement signed in 1990 between the Commonwealth,
the States and the Territories (except Western Australia), all jurisdictions,
with the exception of Western Australia, enacted model uniform trade
measurement legislation.
In 1995 a Trade Measurement Advisory Committee ("TMAC")
was formed by the Ministerial Council on Consumer Affairs ("MCCA")
and one of its functions was the ongoing review of trade measurement
legislation nationally.
TMAC has recommended that the trade measurement legislation be
amended to improve trade measurement administration and MCCA has
requested that Queensland proceed with drafting the recommended
amendments to the Queensland Trade Measurement Act 1990 ("the
Act"). In the interests of uniformity these amendments will
be used as the model by the other participating States and Territories
to amend their own legislation.
Note: The numbering of the Act and Regulations in this document
refers to the Queensland legislation. It may differ from that of
other States and Territories.
This paper addresses one of the proposed amendments and is forwarded
to your organisation for comment because of your involvement in
the relevant industry. Only those amendments that relate to the
operation of your organisation have been forwarded to you for comment.
This paper addresses the proposal to amend section 15 of the Act:
"A new section 15(1)(c) be added to the Act which states
that the administering authority `may provide for certification
periods to be set'.
Section 15(2) of the Act be re-written so that it relates to
the new section 15(1)(c) and states that the administering authority
`may provide for the certification of a measuring instrument
as often as is necessary or desirable in relation to specified
classes of instruments'".
However, should you wish to comment on the other amendments to
the legislation, please contact this Office so that a copy of the
relevant consultation papers can be forwarded to you.
Other Amendments
The other amendments for which Issues Papers have been prepared
are:
1. "Amendment to Section 28 of the Trade Measurement (Pre-packed
Articles) Regulation 1991" - Section 28 of the Trade
Measurement (Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991 should be
amended by repealing the Table and requiring the products listed
in sub-regulation (1) to be unit priced only when packed in random
mass packs.
2. "Amendment of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 - Firewood"
- The provisions of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 should
be amended to make it a requirement to "stack" firewood
for sales by volume. Definitions of "stacked" and "firewood"
are also seen as a requirement. (This does not preclude firewood
being sold by reference to mass or per load.)
3. "The Average Quantity System" - The Average Quantity
System to be introduced into legislation and current shortweight
provisions be repealed. This includes repealing "mass when
packed" and "mass at standard condition" provisions.
4. "Amendment of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 and
the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 - Certificates
of Suitability" - The Trade Measurement Act 1990 and
the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 should
be amended to remove the separate requirement for certificates of
suitability for public weighbridges and a requirement which incorporates
the certificate of suitability as part of the licence be made.
5. "Amendment of Section 23(1) of the Trade Measurement
(Weighbridges) Regulation 1991" - Section 23(1) of the
Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991 should be
amended to make the provision of tare mass books optional.
6. "Amendment of Section 23(2), (3) and (4) of the Trade
Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation 1991" - Section 23(2),
(3) and (4) of the Trade Measurement (Weighbridges) Regulation
1991 should be amended to allow for the electronic printing
and storage of measurement tickets.
7. "Amendment of Section 19(b) of the Trade Measurement
(Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991" - Section 19(b)
of the Trade Measurement (Pre-packed Articles) Regulation 1991
be amended by deleting the existing words and replacing them with:
"(b) the total net mass of all the eggs in the package".
8. "Amendment of Section 25 of the Trade Measurement Act
1990" - Section 25 of the Trade Measurement Act 1990
should be repealed to remove the "Special provisions for sale
of meat".
National Competition Policy
You are also asked to comment on the implications that the amendment
to section 15 of the Act may have in terms of the National Competition
Policy review of legislation. Under the Competition Principles Agreement
signed by the States, Territories and the Commonwealth, it was agreed
that existing legislation and proposed legislation would be reviewed
in terms of its impact on competition in the relevant market. The
Agreement provides that:
"The guiding principle is that legislation ... should
not restrict competition unless it can be demonstrated that:
(a) the benefits of the restriction to the community as a whole
outweigh the costs; and
(b) the objectives of the legislation can only be achieved
by restricting competition".
The review that is to be conducted should:
"(a) clarify the objectives of the legislation;
(b) identify the nature of the restriction on competition;
(c) analyse the likely effect of the restriction on competition
and on the economy generally;
(d) address and balance the costs and benefits of the restriction;
and
(e) consider alternative means for achieving the same result
including non-legislative approaches".
The specific issues that you are asked
to address are set out in the body of this Issues Paper.
HOW TO MAKE COMMENTS
AND SUBMISSIONS
You are invited to make comments and submissions on the issues
raised in this Issues Paper.
You are also invited to contact the MCCA Secretariat to request
information on the other amendments proposed to be made to
the trade measurement legislation.
Written comments and submissions should be sent to:
Facsimile transmissions can be sent to (02) 6263 2960
Email can be sent to npower@treasury.gov.au
Oral submissions can be made by telephoning Malcolm Bartlett
on (07) 3836 0409
Closing date for submissions is 30 November 2000
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
Unless there is an indication from you that you wish your submission
to remain confidential, your submission may be subject to release
under the Freedom of Information Act 1992 (Qld).
Background
Section 15 of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 provides:
"Responsibilities of administering authority concerning
verification and re-verification
(1) It is responsibility of the authority:-
(a) to provide the means by which measuring instruments may
be verified; and
(b) to arrange for the re-verification of measuring instruments
that are in use for trade.
(2) Arrangements under subsection (1)(b) must provide for the
re-verification of a measuring instrument as often as the administering
authority determines is necessary or desirable in relation to
the class of measuring instrument concerned but need not be
made in any cases or circumstances for which the regulations
provide re-verification is not required.
(3) This section does not affect the power of the administering
authority to charge amounts in accordance with the regulations
for or in connection with the verification or re-verification
of measuring instruments.
(4) Even if a measuring instrument is not required by this
Act to bear an Inspector's mark or a licensee's mark, it may
be examined and its calibration tested as if there were such
a requirement but only:-
(a) for the purposes of another Act; or
(b) if the administering authority so approves, at the request
of the person in possession of measuring instrument".
For those Authorities that verify instruments, section 15(1) currently
places the responsibility on the administering authority to ensure
that all trade measuring instruments are re-verified. The term "re-verified"
means that the instrument has been assessed as being correct and
that it complies with the requirements set out in the Act. The instrument
is then "marked" or stamped to the effect that it has
been tested and that it is correct and complies with the Act. It
can then be relied upon as a correct instrument for the determination
of a measurement. However, the onus to ensure that the measuring
instrument is in fact correct remains with the trader.
Under the provisions of the Act only an inspector is permitted
to verify or re-verify a measuring instrument. Other provisions
of the legislation allow for a licensee to certify that a measuring
instrument is correct. In effect, this is a similar function to
that which an inspector performs.
The requirement for instruments to be re-verified under the current
provisions obliges the administering authority to attend the premises
of a trader to re-verify a measuring instrument as often as is determined
by the administering authority. The obligation to ensure that the
measuring instrument has been re-verified is placed upon the administering
authority to attend and conduct the testing and re-verification
process.
Proposal for Amendment
The proposed amendment will change this obligation to allow the
administering authority to set the periods within which measuring
instruments must be certified, re-verified or re-certified. The
responsibility to ensure that a measuring instrument has been certified,
re-verified or re-certified will be placed upon the trader who must
request the administering authority or a licensee to attend the
trader's premises for the purpose of testing and certification,
re-verification or re-certification of the measuring instrument.
The administering authority will still be responsible for setting
the periods in which measuring instruments must be certified, re-certified
or re-verified.
The aim of the amendment is to ensure that all measuring instruments
continue to operate accurately based on performance histories for
those instruments. Licensees will not have the power to enter the
premises of a trader for the purpose of re-certifying a measuring
instrument unless a trader has requested that a re-certification
process be undertaken. The administering authority will, however,
have the power to enter premises to conduct random tests at the
discretion of the administering authority as is currently the case.
The obligation to ensure that a measuring instrument has been re-certified
or re-verified will be placed on the trader. In a number of States
and Territories, this is currently the responsibility of the administering
authority. In some circumstances, the proposed amendment could involve
an increased cost to some instrument owners because their instruments
will require certification, re-verification or re-certification
more frequently. Placing the obligation on the trader to ensure
that an instrument has been certified, re-certified or re-verified
will free up some resources for trade measurement authorities so
that the authorities are better able to monitor trade measurement
practices.
The primary objective of trade measurement legislation is to promote
fair trading and accuracy in the relevant market places. Trade measurement
authorities are responsible for ensuring that traders and consumers
are confident that goods are bought and sold in a fair and equitable
manner.
This amendment will ensure that all measuring instruments are tested
within reasonable time frames. The benefit to the consumer in ensuring
that this is done will be that greater confidence can be placed
in the practices undertaken by traders in the sale of goods because
there will be increased monitoring of trading practices and checkweighing
of prepacked articles.
Traders will benefit from being reassured that their measuring
instruments are continuing to operate within tolerance levels and
that they are not giving product away unknowingly.
National Competition Policy guidelines provide that the benefit
to the restriction to the community should outweigh the costs and
that the objectives of the legislation cannot be achieved by any
other means.
Both traders and consumers will benefit from this amendment and
the amendment should not result in any restriction on competition.
You are invited to comment on the amendment. In particular your
comments in relation to the following questions are welcomed:
1. Should section 15 of the Trade Measurement Act 1990 be
amended as described? Why do you think so?
2. Will the amendment as described have any impact on you whether
you are a trader or a consumer?
3. If it is considered that the amendment will impact on you, can
you describe the potential costs to you either as a trader or a
consumer?
4. Are there any potential restrictions involved in the proposed
amendment?
5. If there are considered to be any restrictions, will these restrictions
involve any cost or disadvantage to you as either a trader or consumer?
6. Will the proposed amendment have any impact on competition in
the market place in which you either trade or purchase goods? If
so, what impact will it have?
7. Are there any other issues that you consider relevant?
If you are interested in participating in follow up consultation
on these issues, please provide us with a telephone number where
you can be contacted during office hours.
|